Year 3: The Scholar
ST306 Dissertation
The degree's final work: a 10,000-word dissertation on a question of your own within the field, built in six stages from proposal to submission. The workshops do what a supervisor does: ask the hard questions early, insist on evidence, and refuse to let a chapter drift. Everything you have learned since ST101 is in play.
Introduction
A dissertation is a long argument that someone else could check. Umberto Eco, whose guide was written for Italian students in 1977 and is still the best, says a thesis should teach its writer something and be a contribution, however small, that did not exist before. At 10,000 words, yours will be about ten times a Year One essay and two and a half times the independent study. It can hold one question, one argument, and four or five chapters that build it. It cannot hold everything you know.
The six workshops follow the stages: the question and proposal; the literature review; the architecture of chapters; the drafting schedule and the voice; the revision; and the final checks, reference list and reflective statement. Each week has a deliverable, and the first assignment, the proposal and literature review, is due after Workshop 3. The dissertation itself is the second.
The rules of the degree apply in full and are the rules of any research: verify before you assert; see before you cite; describe images, never reproduce them; write every word yourself. The independent study of ST305 taught the craft at a quarter of the length. This module asks you to sustain it.
Learning objectives
- Design a dissertation question and proposal that a 10,000-word study can answer.
- Write a literature review that maps a field and locates a gap.
- Plan a chapter architecture in which each chapter advances one argument.
- Sustain a research argument over 10,000 words with evidence throughout.
- Apply the degree's rules on verification, copyright and citation without exception.
- Reflect critically on the completed research and its limits.
Lessons
Unit 1: Workshop 1: The question
A topic you can finish.
Unit 2: Workshop 2: The literature
Mapping the field and finding the gap.
Unit 3: Workshop 3: Architecture
Chapters that build an argument.
Unit 4: Workshop 4: Drafting
Sustaining the argument.
Unit 5: Workshop 5: Revision
The stranger's reading.
Unit 6: Workshop 6: Submission
Checks, references, reflection.
Core texts
-
Throughout.
-
Workshops 3 to 6.
-
Workshops 1 and 2.
-
Required MHRA Style Guide: A Handbook for Authors, Editors, and Writers of Theses Modern Humanities Research Association, edited by Chloe Paver
Every citation.
-
Every publication fact.
Secondary reading
-
Recommended The Craft of Research Wayne C. Booth, Gregory G. Colomb, Joseph M. Williams, Joseph Bizup and William T. FitzGerald
Workshop 4.
-
Recommended "They Say / I Say": The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein
Workshop 2.
Assessment
Two assessed pieces. The first is the proposal and literature review (3,000 words). The second is the dissertation (10,000 words) with its reflective statement. Both are marked against the degree rubric with research quality and argument weighted most heavily. A dissertation below the pass threshold is returned for resubmission, as with every assignment on this platform.
ST306-A1: Proposal and literature review
Propose your dissertation and review its field: the question, problem, scope, method, chapter architecture with argument sentences and evidence, schedule and limits, followed by a literature review of at least ten secondary sources organised by theme and ending with the gap your dissertation fills.
- Length
- 3000 words (2700 to 3300)
- Sources
- Research assignment, minimum 10 secondary sources. At least ten secondary sources seen and reviewed, at least four scholarly, MHRA style, facts checked.
ST306-A2: The dissertation
Write the dissertation you proposed: a 10,000-word argument answering your question, with an introduction, a literature review, three chapters of argument built from evidence, a chapter or section meeting the strongest objection, and a conclusion, using at least fifteen credible secondary sources of which at least five are scholarly, every one seen, in MHRA style, with a reflective statement.
- Length
- 10000 words (9000 to 11000)
- Sources
- Research assignment, minimum 15 secondary sources. Research assignment. At least fifteen credible secondary sources, at least five scholarly, all seen; MHRA with page numbers; no reproduced images; verification logged.
Source requirements
Assignment 1 requires at least ten secondary sources seen and reviewed. Assignment 2 requires at least fifteen credible secondary sources, of which at least five are scholarly (peer-reviewed articles, university-press books or chapters), every one seen; MHRA style with page numbers throughout.