Year 3: The Scholar

ST301 After Moore: Forty Years of Swamp Thing

Veitch's cancelled time-travel epic and its 2026 completion, Nancy A. Collins's family in the swamp, Morrison and Millar's apocalypse, Vaughan's Tefé, Diggle and Dysart, Snyder and Soule's New 52, Wein's return, Ram V's Levi Kamei and Lemire's Green Hell. What each writer kept, what each changed, and whether a character can outlive the run that defined it.

6 lessons 6 units 2 assignments

Introduction

Alan Moore left in September 1987. The character has been in print, with gaps, ever since, written by Rick Veitch, Doug Wheeler, Nancy A. Collins, Grant Morrison and Mark Millar, Brian K. Vaughan, Andy Diggle, Will Pfeifer, Joshua Dysart, Scott Snyder, Charles Soule, Len Wein again, Tom King, Ram V, Jeff Lemire and others. Every one of them wrote in Moore's shadow, and the shadow is the subject of this module.

Year Three asks harder questions than Year Two, and this is the first. It is a survey, which means breadth, but the assignments demand depth: each writer is read for a decision. Veitch decided the creature could travel in time and met a story DC would not print. Collins decided he was a father. Morrison and Millar decided the world should end. Vaughan decided the daughter was the story. Diggle decided the human template could be removed. Snyder decided Alec Holland should be alive again. Soule decided the character could comment on his own endings. Ram V decided the avatar could be a different man. Each decision is a reading of Moore, and each is evidence for the module's question: is Swamp Thing a character, or a run?

The module cannot cover everything, and it says so. Reading lists point to collected editions; the honest limits of the survey are part of what it teaches.

Learning objectives

  • Map the publication history of Swamp Thing from 1987 to the present with verified dates and creators.
  • Analyse the defining decision of each major run and its relation to Moore.
  • Compare how different writers and artists handle the same character, setting and mythology.
  • Assess the economics and editorial politics of a licensed character over forty years.
  • Use scholarship on a post-Moore run (the Collins run has peer-reviewed criticism) as a model.
  • Argue a position on whether a character survives its defining author.

Lessons

Unit 1: Week 1: Veitch and the story DC would not print

#65 to #87, the Claw of Aelkhund, and the crucifixion that ended a run.

  1. Veitch and the unpublished #88The first writer after Moore, his time-travel epic, the Jesus story DC refused, and its completion thirty-seven years later.150 min

Unit 2: Week 2: The family in the swamp

Wheeler, Collins, Tefé and the environmentalist family romance.

  1. Collins and the family: #110 to #139Nancy A. Collins makes the creature a father, and a peer-reviewed article reads what that meant.150 min

Unit 3: Week 3: Apocalypse

Morrison, Millar and the end of the world: #140 to #171.

  1. Morrison, Millar and the apocalypse"Bad Gumbo", the Parliaments of everything, and a run that decided the creature's story could only end with the world.150 min

Unit 4: Week 4: The daughter and the reboots

Vaughan, Diggle, Dysart: 2000 to 2006.

  1. Vaughan, Diggle and Dysart: the 2000sTefé as protagonist, the creature without his human template, and a run that returned to the swamp.150 min

Unit 5: Week 5: The New 52

Snyder and Soule, 2011 to 2015.

  1. Snyder and Soule: the New 52Alec Holland alive again, the Rot, the Rotworld crossover, and a run that ended by talking about endings.150 min

Unit 6: Week 6: The present

Wein, Ram V, Lemire, and the essay.

  1. The present, and the essayThe creator's return, a new avatar, a Black Label hell, and the question of whether Swamp Thing is a character or a run.150 min

Core texts

Secondary reading

Assessment

Two assessed pieces. The first is a comparative close reading of the first issue of any post-Moore run against The Saga of the Swamp Thing #21. The second is a research essay on whether Swamp Thing is a character or a run, requiring at least four secondary sources.

ST301-A1: Comparative close reading: a first issue against "The Anatomy Lesson"

Choose the first issue of any post-Moore run (Veitch #65, Collins #110, Morrison and Millar #140, Vaughan #1, Diggle #1, Snyder #1, Soule #19, Wein 2016 #1, Ram V #1 or Lemire #1). Read it closely against The Saga of the Swamp Thing #21. What does the later issue take from Moore, what does it refuse, and what does the comparison reveal about how each writer understands the character?

Length
2000 words (1800 to 2200)
Sources
Primary source plus optional secondary research. Primary sources plus optional secondary reading. Two issues, compared on the page.

Open this assignment

ST301-A2: Essay: character or run?

Is Swamp Thing a character that survives its authors, or a run (Moore's) that later writers can only reread? Argue a position using at least five post-Moore runs as evidence, the peer-reviewed article on the Collins run, and at least one publisher or creator account of an editorial decision (the cancellation of Veitch's #88 is the obvious case).

Length
3000 words (2700 to 3300)
Sources
Research assignment, minimum 4 secondary sources. Research assignment. At least four credible secondary sources including one peer-reviewed or scholarly source and one publisher or creator account; MHRA with page numbers.

Open this assignment

Source requirements

Assignment 1 is primary source plus optional secondary reading. Assignment 2 is a research assignment: at least four credible secondary sources, including at least one peer-reviewed article or scholarly chapter and at least one publisher or creator interview or account, cited as such.