Year 1: Roots of the Swamp
ST102 Gothic Monsters
Five nineteenth and early twentieth-century texts that built the modern monster, read closely and then read through monster theory, so that when Swamp Thing rises from the water you know exactly what tradition he is standing in.
Introduction
Swamp Thing did not arrive from nowhere. Every convention Wein and Wrightson reached for, the laboratory, the ruined body, the double, the old house, the indifferent cosmos, was made by an earlier writer and worn smooth by a century of use. This module reads five of those makers: Mary Shelley, Robert Louis Stevenson, Bram Stoker, Edgar Allan Poe and H. P. Lovecraft. All five texts are out of copyright and free to read.
The sixth week turns to theory. Jeffrey Jerome Cohen's seven theses, Noel Carroll's account of why we enjoy being horrified, Julia Kristeva's idea of the abject and Jack Halberstam's reading of the Gothic body are the tools the rest of the degree uses. You will meet them here in order, after you have formed your own view of the monsters, so that theory sharpens your reading rather than replacing it.
The habit this module builds is comparison. Each lesson asks you to hold a nineteenth-century monster beside the creature from the Louisiana swamp and say, with evidence, what has been inherited and what has been changed.
Learning objectives
- Read five foundational Gothic texts closely and identify their central monster and the fear it carries.
- Recognise and name the major Gothic conventions: the made body, the double, the invader, the decaying house, the indifferent cosmos.
- Apply monster theory (Cohen, Carroll, Kristeva, Halberstam) to a primary text with precision.
- Compare a nineteenth-century monster with Swamp Thing on a defined point, using evidence from both.
- Write a close reading of prose that attends to sentence, image and point of view.
- Keep a research record in the Green Book that separates your own reaction from what critics say.
Lessons
Unit 1: Week 1: The made body
Frankenstein and the creature who was never given a name.
Unit 2: Week 2: The double
Jekyll and Hyde: two selves in one body.
Unit 3: Week 3: The invader
Dracula: contagion, borders, and the monster who comes to you.
Unit 4: Week 4: The house and the land
Poe's Usher: decay as landscape.
Unit 5: Week 5: The indifferent cosmos
Lovecraft's colour: the land poisoned by something that does not care.
Unit 6: Week 6: What monsters are for
Cohen, Carroll, Kristeva, Halberstam: the theory, after the texts.
Core texts
-
Week 1.
-
Week 2.
-
Week 3.
-
Week 4.
-
Week 5.
-
Week 6 and Assignment 2.
Secondary reading
-
Throughout.
-
Week 6.
-
Week 6, opening chapter only.
-
Recommended Skin Shows: Gothic Horror and the Technology of Monsters Jack Halberstam (published as Judith Halberstam)
Week 6.
-
For the comics connection.
Assessment
Two assessed pieces. The first is a close reading of one passage from one of the module's primary texts, on how the monster's body is described. The second is a comparative essay using at least two of Cohen's theses to set Swamp Thing beside one nineteenth-century monster.
ST102-A1: Close reading: the monstrous body in prose
Choose one passage of no more than two pages from Frankenstein, Jekyll and Hyde, Dracula, "The Fall of the House of Usher" or "The Colour Out of Space" in which a monstrous body (or a place treated as a body) is described. How does the prose make it monstrous?
- Length
- 1500 words (1350 to 1650)
- Sources
- Primary source only. Primary source only. One passage, quoted in full, analysed in detail. No secondary reading.
ST102-A2: Essay: Swamp Thing among the monsters
Using two of Cohen's seven theses, compare the Swamp Thing of Wein and Wrightson's first issues with one nineteenth or early twentieth-century monster from this module. What does the comparison reveal about what each monster is for?
- Length
- 2000 words (1800 to 2200)
- Sources
- Research assignment, minimum 1 secondary sources. Research assignment. Cohen's "Monster Culture (Seven Theses)" is required and must be cited. Further secondary sources are optional. Primary evidence from both the comic and the chosen text is required.
Source requirements
Assignment 1 is primary source only. Assignment 2 is a research assignment with one required secondary source (Cohen's "Monster Culture"); further secondary reading from the module list is welcome but not required.